Author: Jeff Larche

  • Going to Adobe Summit? Here’s one reason I’d love to connect with you there

    Going to Adobe Summit? Here’s one reason I’d love to connect with you there

    Two things you might not now know about me: I’m mildly dyslexic, and I’ve been in marketing technology for decades. That second point is relevant here because, in an industry full of folks much younger than me, I’ve come to realize my long career is of unexpected value.

    Along with many modern business books, I have a home library of wisdom from great thinkers that the years have mostly pushed to obscurity. I’m thinking now of a book co-written by another marketing elder, sadly now departed, who taught and published out of a college at Northwestern University. I had the pleasure of seeing Don E. Schulz, PhD speak live.

    Predicting Our Measurable World

    At the presentation, sponsored by the American Marketing Association in the early 1990s, he told me and a room of mostly ad professionals that their careers were about to change dramatically. I leaned forward to learn more.

    (I was a direct response consultant at the time, definitely a second class citizen in the room. I was used to it, especially within the very ad agency that employed me at the time — and which eventually pushed me out because I wanted our marketing success to be measured by more than just the number of Addy awards handed out at lavish, self-congratulatory banquets reminiscent of the Oscar Awards event I’ll be watching tomorrow night.)

    The men and women seated around me in their fine silk and wool suits were fully invested in things staying exactly as they had been for decades. They didn’t like what Dr. Schulz had to say.

    He announced to a stunned audience that the power dynamics of broadcast marketing was about to reverse, much like the nearby Chicago River that historically had flowed in one direction but through engineering had completely reversed its flow.

    Yes, that dramatic a change.

    And instead of the flow of water, he was talking about cash.

    The way he explained it, ad agencies, which all happily followed the Mad Men business model of producing ads for the masses (and earning 15% commisions on every magazine, radio and television ad bought on those channels), was going to be decimated by internet technology that would soon place more power into the hands of consumers.

    He talked about targeted marketing. I leaned forward even farther in my chair.

    Instead of “spraying and praying” — telling everyone who would listen about the latest product showcased in their shiny ads — there would be a marketplace where consumers looking for a type of product would anonymously advertise their intent. He called this middle business that would manage the market of interest and intent an “infomediary.” It would gather the products via the internet and, only once the consumer had found one of interest, would it reveal this prospective buyer’s identity to the brand.

    The details back then were sketchy. But years later Google, through its AdWords program, would become that middle business. Intent would be “advertised” by the keywords consumers typed into the search bar. And much of the wealth that had flowed to ad agencies would be captured by this massive and efficient infomediary, giving consumers unprecedented power and choice.

    An Anti-Mad-Man Who Predicted CDPs

    The audience was visibly upset. Where folks would start by politely raising their hands to get more details, by the end I distinctly recall some of them leaping to their feet to ask their questions in urgent tones.

    I found it quite entertaining.

    Just as Schulz didn’t have the specifics about Google that night, he didn’t mention in the book he co-authored the concept of a Customer Data Platform (CDP). But in that book, Measuring Brand Communication ROI, he created a brilliant framework for measuring the dollar impact of CDPs on brand value and revenue.

    Although his book is long out of print, you can read about about his framework in my eBook. You can download it here.

    And watch this space for additional reasons why I’d love to talk to you in two weeks at Adobe Summit.

  • VR for the ultra-rich classical music fan

    VR for the ultra-rich classical music fan

    I recently speculated on my personal blog about what a Superbowl halftime show might feel like in the metaverse of the year 2025. What about right now? If your idea of peak experience live entertainment leans more toward a Chopin recital by Chinese virtuoso Yuja Wang (pictured) than NFL playoffs, and you’re dripping in disposable cash, your virtual reality (VR) head rush awaits.

    Steinway has produced self-playing pianos for many years. Now they offer a version that plays, in real time, performances by concert hall superstars.

    Music once performed in the homes of royalty, now available to their modern counterparts

    When you think of the metraverse, your first thoughts likely jump to the VR goggles that surround you with three-dimensional visual experiences. Aural immersions are rare. But if you think of an analog playback device engineered to give you an authentic listening experience, these pianos fill the bill. (And don’t call this device a mere example of the Internet of Things (IoT). It’s unfair, or at least insufficient. This is no “smart television.”)

    How is this innovation being funded? By investors who understand that the market for these pianos isn’t vast … until you factor in China. Consider the extraordinary Yuja Wang. She is the product of a culture prizing both classical performances and, if these numbers account for anything, piano ownership …

    Steinway filed for an IPO in April, where they mentioned that the piano market in China is the world’s largest: China accounts for an average of around 400,000 pianos sold annually from 2017 to 2020, compared to a paltry 30,000 per year in the U.S. for the same period.

    97% of concert pianists used [Steinway] pianos at their concerts in the 2018-2019 season

    Impressively, the IPO also contended, “Though we are only one of many manufacturers who make pianos for the concert-hall stage, approximately 97% of concert pianists used our pianos at their concerts in the 2018-2019 season [ the last time period measured due to the Covid pandemic].”

    It’s no wonder then — with this near monopoly on their brand found beneath the exacting fingertips of maestros — that Steinways would seek to connect those fingertips via the cloud to their self-playing pianos.

    Companies like Meta are investing heavily to someday lure us to their mediated VR worlds. Meanwhile this is one VR experience that can be had today — with a six-figure investment in the “goggles.”

  • Three lessons from my 15 years on Twitter

    Three lessons from my 15 years on Twitter

    Today is my 15th year on Twitter. The medium has changed a lot over the years. More importantly, it has changed me. And society. Here are my thoughts.

    1. Twitter’s history has been a dance between innovative users and its sometimes canny developers

    The above post on this blog was from its very early days. Twitter was born of SMS, that 140-character text capability that was a biproduct of cell service. The character limit wasn’t alone in suppressing adoption. So was the fact that early cell phones, pre-cell-based-broadband, actually charged you once your texts exceeded a certain monthly maximum.

    I was new enough on the platform, following pitifully few people and being followed by fewer, that this never phased me. But it was a problem for danah boyd. She is was anthropologist studying (at the time) youth and technology, before she left academia to work and publish at Microsoft Research.

    boyd’s thoughts on the new technology called Twitter, which she encountered full-on at the 2007 South-by-Southwest, could be summed up in her blog post’s lead: “SXSW has come and gone and my phone might never recover. … To the best that i can tell, i received something like 3000 Tweets during the few days i was in Austin. My phone was constantly hitting its 100 message cap and i spent more time trying to delete messages than reading them.” (danah admitted at the time she was under the heavy sway of ani difranco, and her capitalization habits reflected it and still do.)

    Twitter’s developers solved this problem within the year, by developing an app-based approach to following and reading tweets. But other innovations came from the users themselves, notably the invention of the hashtag. It was proposed by Chris Messina, late in the summer of 2007:

    https://twitter.com/chrismessina/status/223115412

    Adoption spread quickly, and soon Twitter had built an easy search mechanism for hashtags that we all take for granted.

    2. Twitter has fostered grassroots revolutions and community-based journalism

    I feel privileged to have witnessed history as it unfolded. One example is the Arab Spring of 2010-12, where, especially in Egypt and Tunisia, Twitter and Facebook helped to organize protests and, in cases such as Libya, take down dictatorial regimes.

    Closer to home, I recall following the updates about the pursuit of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects nine years ago from two screens: My television, tuned to CNN, and my cell phone. As reporters on the ground, and copters circling the neighborhood where the bombers were hiding, were frantically speculating where they could have disappeared to, people I followed on Twitter were already, correctly, speculating they were hiding under the storage tarp of a boat parked in a driveway.

    3. Forging friendships and business associations I never could have had

    Especially since I quit Facebook, in light of the company’s egregious disregard for member privacy and spreading of fake news, Twitter has been my primary social media app for deepening some friendships and forging new one. Especially when I return to my old stomping grounds in Milwaukee, I often connect with people I have gotten to know on the platform extremely well. Twitter friends only, it’s been fun to meet them IRL.

    I’m reminded that “adulting” often gets in the way of making new friends. Twitter has helped me in that important aspect of happy adulthood (and helped me familiarized myself with a ton of coinages such as IRL and adulting!).

    Where from here?

    These are the three bright spots on what could be a condemnation of social media. But I’m not Pollyanna. I am reminded daily of how Twitter has contributed to the disassembly of professional journalism and proliferation of filter bubbles, leading to no shared community or belief in things that are unquestionably true.

    But what strikes me today, on the very day I first registered on the platform, is how much Twitter has contributed to my life, and the course of technological, social and geopolitical history.

  • All experiments should end with a bang

    All experiments should end with a bang

    In a perfect world, all A/B and Multi-variate Tests you conduct should be as expectantly observed (and ghoulishly revisited) as the one conducted last week, pictured above.

    Before the test launch of SpaceX Starship, Elon Musk said there was a one-in-three chance it would not survive to a successful landing. He was wise to set expectations. It exploded upon contact with the earth.

    I loved that Musk called the mission an “awesome test,” noting “We got all the data we needed.”

    Spoken like a true scientist.

    How do you handle and publicize your failed tests? I hope you celebrate them for the data you gathered. Put yourself in Musk’s shoes: He paid dearly for a pile of burned shards, but in return he got measurements throughout the flight that will help him rocket above the competition (sorry) to claim the profits in manned space flight he is chasing.

    The only true failed experiment is the one where the data gathered is not applied to future efforts.

  • Adobe to buy Workfront: A big win for marketing throughput

    Adobe to buy Workfront: A big win for marketing throughput

    Workflow management is often an afterthought. That’s a big mistake, especially when it comes to marketing execution. The late Eliyahu M. Goldratt told us this in his books from nearly forty years ago, starting with The Goal, and especially its follow-up ten years later, It’s Not Luck.

    Those books are ancient business history, yet this proven competitive advantage continues to go ignored by most enterprises. I know. I’ve seen it in my many years of digital marketing consulting. But things are starting to change. What’s more, I consider Adobe’s announced plan to purchase Workfront as a sign that this progress is accelerating.

    Let’s face it: Workflow management isn’t sexy. But following the adage of You can’t manage what you don’t measure, the pace of executing your marketing strategy can stall if you aren’t identifying and fixing constraints in the pipeline. That’s where Workfront shines. But first, a little more about how we got here.

    The Theory of Constraints

    Goldratt initially created his Theory of Constraints (TOC) because Western manufacturers were quickly losing ground to the Japanese makers of cars, televisions, and much else. At the time he maintained that improved throughput was a secret weapon for the modern manufacturer … and marketer. (He looked at several categories of workflow in his books, and devoted It’s Not Luck to marketing effectiveness.)

    Speed-to-market — what Goldratt called throughput — reduces inventories, stabilizes costs, and helps a brand prevail over less-nimble competitors. Out of Goldratt’s work (along with others of his ilk) came entire categories of TOC-driven productivity, most notably modern logistics.

    Let’s look at a common marketing example:

    It’s a competitive no-no to take many weeks between conceiving a campaign and its execution, using a tool like (in this example) Adobe Campaign. But constructing campaigns in Campaign is hard work! There are so many skilled hands that must touch the work product, in sequence or in parallel — doing everything from copy writing and photography to graphic design, data science, coding and quality assurance (QA) testing.

    Non-waterfall approaches to the work, particularly Agile, are, to use a phrase that is the title of another of Goldratt’s books: Necessary but Not Sufficient. Agile in this context is no panacea.

    Achieving Spreadsheet and Email Escape Velocity

    In order to move the work efficiently, you need to get everyone out of the tyranny of email threads and shared Excel spreadsheets. Managing projects of this complexity must be handled by a platform, with automated hand-offs and reporting.

    I can hear some of you now: “We’re good. We have Jira to do that!” or “We have [the Microsoft Jira clone] Azure DevOps [ADO].”

    Yeah, no.

    Marketing involves more than technologists. It demands creatives, plus many layers of stakeholders. These folks haven’t the patience to learn the language and interconnections of those development and bug-fixing tools.

    Workfront is the industry leader in providing a marketer-friendly solution. I’ve seen it in action. It can track campaigns, A/B tests, tagging, insight generation and much more. It does something else that would have warmed Mr. Goldratt’s heart.

    Finding and Fixing Bottlenecks

    You’ll recall that the “C” in TOC stands for constraints. And a constraint is just a fancy word for a workflow bottleneck. These are the slowest stages in the path leading to a successfully delivered project. Typically, Goldratt observed, you can only see one of them at a time. That’s because if you observe work piling up at a particular step, the system upstream slows, making other, upstream bottlenecks undetectable.

    Thus the 5-step cycle that he described in his books, and is shown at the top of this post.

    Another clarification: By “exploiting” constraints, Goldratt had simply meant opening up the log jam. In manufacturing, (and frankly, also in marketing project management), that can mean things like this:

    • Doing as much QA as possible before the constraint
    • Hiring a second resource
    • Adding a second or faster machine used to do the work

    Once you’ve cleared one logjam, it’s guaranteed that will expose another. That’s just life in project workflow management.

    You can do none of the work I describe unless you have the reporting necessary to see the bottlenecks. And if you’re using manual reporting today, just realize that won’t scale as capacity increases.

    These productivity reports are where Workfront really shines. Marketing projects managed this way move through the system more smoothly and create an environment conducive to other improvements, e.g., unanticipated process innovations.

    You cannot manage what you do not measure, indeed.

    Managing Inputs and Outputs from Adobe Platforms

    All of this is why I’m so pleased that a major digital experience company has decided to buy Workfront. Arguably every platform in the Adobe Experience Cloud has inputs and outputs that must be managed by many types of roles. By eventually providing a workflow management tool to knit together this work, the value of Adobe’s cloud will grow.

    As a process guy, I’m loving this development. But let me know what you think. I’ve turned off comments, but I have an extremely “googleable” name. You can find me on social media and let me know your thoughts.