Category: Campaign Marketing

  • AI boosts ecommerce conversions by compressing evolution

    AI boosts ecommerce conversions by compressing evolution

    Every sale on your ecommerce site travels through four phases: Attention, Interest, Desire and Action (AIDA). Before AI, optimizing each meant months of randomized controlled tests, slow feedback loops, and lots of guesswork. AI compresses that personalization cycle dramatically. Marketers using it have a distinct competitive advantage

    To explain how, I’m pulling from two creatures found in nature. They evolved over millennia to do exactly what your ecommerce experience needs. One of them might be the strangest and most instructive thing you’ve never heard of.

    I described those two creatures recently on another blog site, Dyslexic Data. The title: Using data to visualize evolutionary forces. There I explained how the pair have evolved to catch and eat the optimal number of bugs, in a feat of natural selection that evolutionary biologists have visualized.

    Although you should not expect either showing up in an upcoming Pixar feature, in my mind’s eye I do see them, above, fitting in nicely outside The Haunted Mansion. (I describe the significance of this Disneyland attraction in another post, also on Dyslexic Data). 

    First, the spider: A creature so reviled it even has a phobia named after it. I asked AI to make it look friendly. Still, all those legs! It’s hard to avoid the creep factor.

    The other isn’t shown, because, 1.) It is genuinely hideous, and 2.) It spends its phase of life hiding in loose sand, at the bottom of funnel-shaped depressions like the three shown in the foreground. 

    This shy, larval stage of the lacewing, is called the ant lion.

    Growing qualified visits by optimizing attention and interest

    AI is rewriting the economics of all four phases of AIDA. The first two, before modern LLMs, were addressed by the human optimization of paid and organic search, as well as digital display ads. Algorithms helped, but decisions based on feedback loops were slow and data was thin.

    You can think of this process, pre-AI, as similar to the silk spun by the very first ancestors of modern spiders. They weren’t very efficient. 

    The computer simulator described in my evolution blog post makes a case that natural selection and food scarcity inevitably drive generations of spiders to spin webs optimized for the lowest calorie expenditure yielding the greatest caloric intake. If you ran that NetSpinner simulation a thousand times, over multiple generations, each pass would iteratively, gradually evolve to what you see above: the classic Charlotte’s Web bug-catcher. 

    Every single time. Now that’s optimization!

    Similarly, modern machine learning works to optimize your campaigns for better attraction of attention and generation of interest. Here are just three of the mechanisms:

    1. It does a better job of stitching identities in your customer data platform (CDP)
    2. It refines your organic and paid campaigns by providing more actionable data
    3. It continually interprets that data to launch and test multiple ad variants

    Those actions include look-alike modeling, to find more prospects similar to your best customers, and suppression models, to ensure you aren’t “wasting silk” — in this case, your ad dollars — on people who are already customers.

    In these ways and the others below, AI compresses evolution by quickly learning the best placement of its own “sticky silk strands” to capture the attention and interest of ideal prospects.

    From search rankings to AI recommendations: the new attention engine

    Organic search marketing, also known as search engine optimization (SEO), is still important. 

    AI helps there too. 

    It can optimize your product description pages to rank higher in search engines for the phrases your customers use to find the products.

    Rapidly emerging as a counterpart to SEO is agentic engine optimization (AEO … sometimes called GEO for “generative engine optimization”). AEO / GEO acknowledges that attention and interest take place in ways we marketers find difficult to quantify, in recommendations made by ChatGPT and other chatbots.

    Agents such as Optimizely’s Opal can build the data schemas within your product description pages that are invisible to human visitors but instructive to bots.

    Those schemas serve as training datasets for the LLMs. They help persuade chatbots to recommend your products over competitors when consulted by your prospects.

    Measuring Success

    Success metrics in a world of AEO / GEO can be tricky. 

    In the old world, interest was measured by the raw number of people who arrived at your site. Since the emergence of Google Gemini, ChatGPT and their ilk, marketers are noticing significantly fewer visitors. That’s because consideration for many is happening on search engine answer sections and the recommendations served up by the chatbots. 

    Here are two metrics that still work:

    1. An increased return on ad spent (ROAS)
    2. A reduced number of clicks leading to conversion, since people are generally arriving more knowledgeable about your offerings, with fewer questions

    Boosting desire and action through optimized conversion funnels

    I’ve known about ant lions since I was a morbid little boy. As a digital marketer, I recognized they’ve evolved to produce a literal, perfect conversion funnel.

    The ant lion hangs out at the bottom. When it senses an ant has stumbled onto the rim, it flings its shovel-shaped head to toss grains of sand up and over.

    The unwitting ant works against the avalanche as it begins a downward slide. The ant lion counters with more targeted shoveling. In stages, similar to the steps of conversion funnels that are your site’s shopping experiences, any slip-up would mean escape, and a ruined dinner.

    The Action at the end of the Desire phase is, of course, a sale. Improving your conversion funnels to optimize sales, before AI, was slow and imperfect. 

    True, funnel-optimizing A/B and multivariate testing succeeded in the pre-AI world, by using complex math to measure improvements. But today, AI makes these calculations and decisions in an instant, based on more variables than you could ever hold in your mind (the segment of that prospect, the visit source, day and time, and purchase history, to name just a few attributes).

    AI ensures that every method to reduce conversion funnel attrition is put to practice in real time. The result? A greater share of your prospects pass from Desire to Action.

    Measuring Success

    What metrics would tell you if your conversion funnels are performing like a well-dug ant lion trap? Here are two:

    1. Conversion rate, as measured from sales divided by entries into the relevant product description page.
    2. Shopping basket size, since AI can also supercharge your “You may also like” recommendations

    Better webs, smarter funnels

    AI doesn’t change what a sale is. It compresses the time it takes to get there … to serve up the right message and experience for the right person at every stage of the process. 

    Chances are some of your competitors are already using AI to spin better webs and dig more efficient funnels. The question isn’t whether to adopt AI. It’s which phase of your AIDA cycle you optimize first. 

    Start there.

  • Why isn’t the Disaffection Index (DI) more popular with campaign marketers?

    Why isn’t the Disaffection Index (DI) more popular with campaign marketers?

    Many years ago, when self-proclaimed Email Diva and my own personal career doppelganger Melinda Krueger conceived of the Disaffection Index, my only qualms were with its name and acronym. She wrote about this campaign KPI in one of her MediaPost pieces. If I remember correctly, she even sent me a pre-read. I told her I loved the metric but predicted it would become more commonplace with campaign marketers if she gave it a TLA (three letter acronym). I was only half joking.

    You be the judge. First, what is it?

    Rather than unsubscribe / delivered, the DI is calculated by dividing unsubscribes by the response rate …

    Calculated this way, the DI tells you how many people either a.) clicked on your e-mail for the sole purpose of getting off your list or b.) were so dissatisfied … they chose to unsubscribe.

    Excerpt from “The New Unsubscribe Rate”

    Today every subscriber and brand loyalist is worth too much to squander. So why isn’t this KPI on every campaign manager’s dashboard?

    Last Click Index (LCI) to the rescue!

    I humbly suggested at the time that LCI was a better term for two reasons. First, it adds drama. When someone unsubscribes, you’d believe you weren’t getting any more clicks from them. B*tch, bye!

    And secondly, I had then and still have zero affection for the word disaffection. But it’s her baby, and a rose is a rose by any name. (Clever guy, that Shakespeare).

    So if you’re a campaign marketer, start using it, regardless of its inferior name. You’ll thank me. And Melinda.

    Melinda is currently an Associate Principal for the Salesforce Marketing Cloud, and I predict she will laugh heartily when she reads this. I do hope so. I miss talking shop with her!

  • When is an email click-through not a click-through? Think “unsubscribe”

    When is an e-mail click-through not a click-through? When they’re telling you to kiss off!

    It’s hard to believe it’s been nearly a year since I had lunch with my friend and long-time career doppleganger, Melinda Krueger, and she told me about her latest email metrics discovery. It was a way to take into account the click-throughs that people register from your emails when they are in fact clicking through to unsubscribe.

    She described it, and it made perfect sense. Melinda’s formula in many cases would take meaningless data and actually tell us something. Specifically, it measures the power of a specific offer or message to cause a segment of your email audience to decide that enough is enough.

    She was thinking of calling it the DI, the Disaffection Index. Personally, I thought something a little more dramatic was in order for a metric that could enter the email lexicon. I suggested, because it measured their very last click-through with you, the LCI — the Last Click Index.

    She thought otherwise, and DI it remained. Do read this article, and the other articles and advice that Melinda provides as MediaPost’s “Email Diva.”