Testing in the online world has never become easier or more affordable. It’s therefore no surprise that many assumptions about online ads are being reconsidered. Today, Enquirio and Google announced the validation of one such tenet. It had been assumed, through common sense and improved response rates, that an ad displayed in the context of similar subject matter will do better than one with no relationship to content.
What do we mean by contextual ad placement? The premise is that if I’m an executive who influences a decision to purchase construction equipment, and I see an ad as I review a construction industry portal site, I am more likely to recall the message — and the brand — than if I saw the same ad on an unrelated site.
In research by Enquirio and commissioned by Google, this assumption was validated. The research methodology included randomized test subjects, given tasks related to the content of the sites they were reviewing. Some sites contained ads that were relevant, others contained the same ads but had no connection to those ads’ subject matter.
Results were gathered in the form of questionnaire answers and aggregate eye scan heat maps of the sites being reviewed.
Two key take-aways:
- Through contextually relevant business-to-business (B-to-B) ads, purchasers are 52% more likely to associate your message with your brand
- With contextually relevant B-to-B ads, it is 28% more likely that your brand “will make the cut” and be shortlisted.
The Enquirio site has the whitepaper available for download.