<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media 101: Get your feet wet with Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/</link>
	<description>Marketing Technology Musings and Tips by Jeff Larche</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:13:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to get non-Twitter users to tweet - Digital Solid: Marketing Technology ROI</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-5852</link>
		<dc:creator>How to get non-Twitter users to tweet - Digital Solid: Marketing Technology ROI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=1158#comment-5852</guid>
		<description>[...] written before about how Facebook is a perfect set of social media training wheels for the newbie. This is more evidence of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about how Facebook is a perfect set of social media training wheels for the newbie. This is more evidence of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Quick</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-4762</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=1158#comment-4762</guid>
		<description>I agree that Facebook is a better gateway to social media for most people, and that Twitter is better for those who have their social media legs under them.

In recent months I have watched my mother leap into Facebook, happily friending the people she knows and commenting on their status and pictures. It&#039;s easy, it&#039;s fun, and you automatically have something to do once you get there - connect with the people you know.

Twitter is a network I love passionately, but most people just don&#039;t get it.  Who do you follow?  What do you Tweet about?  Isn&#039;t it weird that people follow you who don&#039;t know you - like stalking?  

I came to Twitter as someone who already read a lot of blogs, and had started a blog of my own. I followed my favorite bloggers and authors, searched for people who were interested in the same subjects as me, and had plenty to Tweet about.  I&#039;m not sure exactly which personality types thrive on Twitter, but I know it has been a hard sell to my clients, even the ones who are interested in blogging and social media.

A lawyer/client of mine called and said, &quot;I&#039;m on Facebook and I love it.  I&#039;m on it every night.  Now how do I use it for marketing my business? I mainly use Facebook to find friends from high school, fellow Unitarian Universalists, and people who are into Burning Man.&quot;  

I suggested the lawyer start a blog about legal stuff, and then explore using Twitter to build an audience. Leave Facebook for the fun stuff. 

Am I the only one who gets a bit overwhelmed by our personal lives and our professional lives getting so tangled up online?  I like to leave a bit of separation - post my personal stuff on Facebook, and focus on my professional life on Twitter.  But I notice this is getting harder as Facebook and Twitter become more entangled.  Tweet Ups that have Facebook groups, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Facebook is a better gateway to social media for most people, and that Twitter is better for those who have their social media legs under them.</p>
<p>In recent months I have watched my mother leap into Facebook, happily friending the people she knows and commenting on their status and pictures. It&#8217;s easy, it&#8217;s fun, and you automatically have something to do once you get there &#8211; connect with the people you know.</p>
<p>Twitter is a network I love passionately, but most people just don&#8217;t get it.  Who do you follow?  What do you Tweet about?  Isn&#8217;t it weird that people follow you who don&#8217;t know you &#8211; like stalking?  </p>
<p>I came to Twitter as someone who already read a lot of blogs, and had started a blog of my own. I followed my favorite bloggers and authors, searched for people who were interested in the same subjects as me, and had plenty to Tweet about.  I&#8217;m not sure exactly which personality types thrive on Twitter, but I know it has been a hard sell to my clients, even the ones who are interested in blogging and social media.</p>
<p>A lawyer/client of mine called and said, &#8220;I&#8217;m on Facebook and I love it.  I&#8217;m on it every night.  Now how do I use it for marketing my business? I mainly use Facebook to find friends from high school, fellow Unitarian Universalists, and people who are into Burning Man.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I suggested the lawyer start a blog about legal stuff, and then explore using Twitter to build an audience. Leave Facebook for the fun stuff. </p>
<p>Am I the only one who gets a bit overwhelmed by our personal lives and our professional lives getting so tangled up online?  I like to leave a bit of separation &#8211; post my personal stuff on Facebook, and focus on my professional life on Twitter.  But I notice this is getting harder as Facebook and Twitter become more entangled.  Tweet Ups that have Facebook groups, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 02:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=1158#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>Absolutely!

Facebook is a great place to start, just because the whole setting up your page, tinkering with it as you will, finding &amp; linking with friends &quot;thing&quot; is moderately self-explanatory, and something that can be put down and picked up at will, days later, without feeling like you&#039;ve missed anything.

Leave Twitter unattended for days, and you may never catch up! Twitter is not difficult, but probably not a great starting point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely!</p>
<p>Facebook is a great place to start, just because the whole setting up your page, tinkering with it as you will, finding &amp; linking with friends &#8220;thing&#8221; is moderately self-explanatory, and something that can be put down and picked up at will, days later, without feeling like you&#8217;ve missed anything.</p>
<p>Leave Twitter unattended for days, and you may never catch up! Twitter is not difficult, but probably not a great starting point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-4759</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=1158#comment-4759</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

Both services offer value, but I believe Twitter offers more value once another social identity has been created.

When I broke in to social networking, a colleague suggested that I get Facebook, Twitter, Digg, Slideshare, Tumblr and SocialMedian.  I use FB and Twitter more than the others right now, but I will find more and more uses for the other networks in short order.

I agree with you Jeff - FB should be the first stop for someone new to social networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>Both services offer value, but I believe Twitter offers more value once another social identity has been created.</p>
<p>When I broke in to social networking, a colleague suggested that I get Facebook, Twitter, Digg, Slideshare, Tumblr and SocialMedian.  I use FB and Twitter more than the others right now, but I will find more and more uses for the other networks in short order.</p>
<p>I agree with you Jeff &#8211; FB should be the first stop for someone new to social networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-4758</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=1158#comment-4758</guid>
		<description>I think this blog post has it exactly right, and except in a few exceptional cases, I can&#039;t see any good defense of Twitter as a starting point for social media.

For someone without much experience with social networking, the concept, pacing, and limitations of Twitter may be a little much to deal with (as compared to Facebook) -- it assumes a slightly greater level of technical know-how, in that images/video/etc must all be handled off-site and linked to (much of the time using a URL shortening service); the userbase is smaller and less structured; the content can move extremely quickly at times; and most importantly, it often does not seem to become quickly evident to someone why others would care to hear the answer to the question &quot;What are you doing?&quot; at any given moment.

Facebook has a huge userbase, a more formal/easily understood structure and feature arrangement, works to be as self-contained and do-the-work-for-you as possible, and is almost certainly slower moving than Twitter. There is a reason we&#039;ve all recently heard that a rapidly growing demographic on Facebook is the middle-aged crowd: it&#039;s more friendly and immediately useful even to those who don&#039;t care to contribute much of their own material. Pictures of people/their kids/their pets, personal information like location and relationship status and interests... the purpose of sharing these things is immediately obvious, you have time to peruse them (because they aren&#039;t just flying past on a timeline and then lost forever), and the technical experience required is very low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this blog post has it exactly right, and except in a few exceptional cases, I can&#8217;t see any good defense of Twitter as a starting point for social media.</p>
<p>For someone without much experience with social networking, the concept, pacing, and limitations of Twitter may be a little much to deal with (as compared to Facebook) &#8212; it assumes a slightly greater level of technical know-how, in that images/video/etc must all be handled off-site and linked to (much of the time using a URL shortening service); the userbase is smaller and less structured; the content can move extremely quickly at times; and most importantly, it often does not seem to become quickly evident to someone why others would care to hear the answer to the question &#8220;What are you doing?&#8221; at any given moment.</p>
<p>Facebook has a huge userbase, a more formal/easily understood structure and feature arrangement, works to be as self-contained and do-the-work-for-you as possible, and is almost certainly slower moving than Twitter. There is a reason we&#8217;ve all recently heard that a rapidly growing demographic on Facebook is the middle-aged crowd: it&#8217;s more friendly and immediately useful even to those who don&#8217;t care to contribute much of their own material. Pictures of people/their kids/their pets, personal information like location and relationship status and interests&#8230; the purpose of sharing these things is immediately obvious, you have time to peruse them (because they aren&#8217;t just flying past on a timeline and then lost forever), and the technical experience required is very low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Larche</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-4757</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Larche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=1158#comment-4757</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Ron. In fact, I think my fellow panelists may have been focused more on which is the most effective SM channel than which is the best SM 101 &quot;sandbox&quot; to play in. 

If I&#039;m mistaken I&#039;d love to know. Anyone want to defend Twitter over Facebook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Ron. In fact, I think my fellow panelists may have been focused more on which is the most effective SM channel than which is the best SM 101 &#8220;sandbox&#8221; to play in. </p>
<p>If I&#8217;m mistaken I&#8217;d love to know. Anyone want to defend Twitter over Facebook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Shevlin</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2009/03/06/social-media-101-get-your-feet-wet-with-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Shevlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=1158#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>I would tend to agree with you, although I probably would have asked the person: &quot;What do you do?&quot;  

There may already be some more narrowly focused social network Ie.g., Banktastic) specific to what that person is involved in.

Facebook might be a bit daunting to someone new to social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to agree with you, although I probably would have asked the person: &#8220;What do you do?&#8221;  </p>
<p>There may already be some more narrowly focused social network Ie.g., Banktastic) specific to what that person is involved in.</p>
<p>Facebook might be a bit daunting to someone new to social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
