<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Summize helps marketers peer into the attitudes of a million+ Twitter fans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/07/09/summize-helps-marketers-peer-into-the-attitudes-of-a-million-twitter-fans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/07/09/summize-helps-marketers-peer-into-the-attitudes-of-a-million-twitter-fans/</link>
	<description>Marketing Technology Musings and Tips by Jeff Larche</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Larche</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/07/09/summize-helps-marketers-peer-into-the-attitudes-of-a-million-twitter-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Larche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=382#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>Matt, I&#039;ll bet they set up a scoring system that places greater weight to a negative comment than one that is positive or neutral. Similar to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_promoter_score&quot; target=&quot;new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Net Promoter Score&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I&#8217;ll bet they set up a scoring system that places greater weight to a negative comment than one that is positive or neutral. Similar to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_promoter_score" target="new" rel="nofollow">Net Promoter Score</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/07/09/summize-helps-marketers-peer-into-the-attitudes-of-a-million-twitter-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-4492</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=382#comment-4492</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand how it determines that the prevailing attitude of twitter buying summize is bad? I count seven &#039;wretched&#039; boxes to 18 &#039;great&#039; and six &#039;bad&#039; to 11 &#039;swell&#039; boxes. I assume &#039;so-so&#039; is neutral?

It sure seems like the good tweets are outweighing the bad according to the weird box chart yet it says the prevailing attitude is bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how it determines that the prevailing attitude of twitter buying summize is bad? I count seven &#8216;wretched&#8217; boxes to 18 &#8216;great&#8217; and six &#8216;bad&#8217; to 11 &#8216;swell&#8217; boxes. I assume &#8216;so-so&#8217; is neutral?</p>
<p>It sure seems like the good tweets are outweighing the bad according to the weird box chart yet it says the prevailing attitude is bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

