<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How little do web users read? Even less than you think</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/05/14/how-little-do-web-users-read-even-less-than-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/05/14/how-little-do-web-users-read-even-less-than-you-think/</link>
	<description>Marketing Technology Musings and Tips by Jeff Larche</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Shevlin</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/05/14/how-little-do-web-users-read-even-less-than-you-think/#comment-4472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Shevlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 20:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/?p=362#comment-4472</guid>
		<description>Assuming that statistic is correct, it does recall the Wanamaker dilemma. In other words (no pun intended), you don't know WHICH 28% of the words on the page the page visitor is going to read. In fact, it's likely that no two visitors will read the same 28%. 

Conclusion: You still have to craft (not just write) all the words that  are appropriate -- even if no one reads all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming that statistic is correct, it does recall the Wanamaker dilemma. In other words (no pun intended), you don&#8217;t know WHICH 28% of the words on the page the page visitor is going to read. In fact, it&#8217;s likely that no two visitors will read the same 28%. </p>
<p>Conclusion: You still have to craft (not just write) all the words that  are appropriate &#8212; even if no one reads all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
