<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow-through is crucial to higher search conversion rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/03/05/follow-through-is-crucial-to-higher-search-conversion-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/03/05/follow-through-is-crucial-to-higher-search-conversion-rates/</link>
	<description>Marketing Technology Musings and Tips by Jeff Larche</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 02:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/03/05/follow-through-is-crucial-to-higher-search-conversion-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-4243</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/03/05/follow-through-is-crucial-to-higher-search-conversion-rates/#comment-4243</guid>
		<description>In our experience, we’ ve seen how click to call can increase sales conversions and improve the overall buyer experience, but across the globe we’ re seeing that largely, consumers still prefer to speak over the phone than through their PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our experience, we’ ve seen how click to call can increase sales conversions and improve the overall buyer experience, but across the globe we’ re seeing that largely, consumers still prefer to speak over the phone than through their PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Larche</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/03/05/follow-through-is-crucial-to-higher-search-conversion-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-4193</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Larche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/03/05/follow-through-is-crucial-to-higher-search-conversion-rates/#comment-4193</guid>
		<description>I agree, Scott, that it&#039;s odd that direct mail doesn&#039;t rank higher for customer retention. Especially with catalog marketers and non-profit fund raisers, the mail is still by far the most successful way to keep customers.

Also, I appreciate the link to VisualComplexity. I&#039;ve drawn inspiration (or pulled examples) from than portal more than once. Explaining visually is more important today than ever, since we&#039;re all drowning in data. Even eMarketer can use some help. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalsolid.com/2007/12/18/survey-of-marketing-tech-types-finds-roi-strongest-for-search-and-internal-email-tactics/&quot; target=&quot;NEW&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt; from late last year took one of their standard tabular charts (as shown above) and improved its effectiveness by adding differing sized circles to back up the percentages reported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Scott, that it&#8217;s odd that direct mail doesn&#8217;t rank higher for customer retention. Especially with catalog marketers and non-profit fund raisers, the mail is still by far the most successful way to keep customers.</p>
<p>Also, I appreciate the link to VisualComplexity. I&#8217;ve drawn inspiration (or pulled examples) from than portal more than once. Explaining visually is more important today than ever, since we&#8217;re all drowning in data. Even eMarketer can use some help. <a href="http://www.digitalsolid.com/2007/12/18/survey-of-marketing-tech-types-finds-roi-strongest-for-search-and-internal-email-tactics/" target="NEW" rel="nofollow">This post</a> from late last year took one of their standard tabular charts (as shown above) and improved its effectiveness by adding differing sized circles to back up the percentages reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Brinker</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/03/05/follow-through-is-crucial-to-higher-search-conversion-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Brinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/2008/03/05/follow-through-is-crucial-to-higher-search-conversion-rates/#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jeff. Thanks for the mention in your post!

You know, the other funny thing I noticed in that report was the relationship between customer acquisition and customer retention. Maybe it&#039;s just my flawed intuition, but as surprised as I was about the ROI dominance of direct mail for customer acquisition, it made more sense to me as a customer retention device. If you receive something in the mail from a company you&#039;re already doing business with, it would seem to have an edge. But direct mail was 1 point less for retention than acquisition. Probably just due to the ROI for email marketing to existing customers being so cost-effective, which makes sense. But at first glance these numbers were a bit of a surprise.

Great topics on your blog! Noticed that we share an interest in Tufte and visualization. Just recently was exploring &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.visualcomplexity.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VisualComplexity.com&lt;/a&gt; and wrote a post on it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chiefmartec.com/2008/02/visualization-i.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jeff. Thanks for the mention in your post!</p>
<p>You know, the other funny thing I noticed in that report was the relationship between customer acquisition and customer retention. Maybe it&#8217;s just my flawed intuition, but as surprised as I was about the ROI dominance of direct mail for customer acquisition, it made more sense to me as a customer retention device. If you receive something in the mail from a company you&#8217;re already doing business with, it would seem to have an edge. But direct mail was 1 point less for retention than acquisition. Probably just due to the ROI for email marketing to existing customers being so cost-effective, which makes sense. But at first glance these numbers were a bit of a surprise.</p>
<p>Great topics on your blog! Noticed that we share an interest in Tufte and visualization. Just recently was exploring <a href="http://www.visualcomplexity.com" rel="nofollow">VisualComplexity.com</a> and wrote a post on it <a href="http://www.chiefmartec.com/2008/02/visualization-i.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

