<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internal search data is free, quantitative usability testing, if you use it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsolid.com/2006/05/17/internal-search-data-is-free-quantitative-usability-testing-if-you-use-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2006/05/17/internal-search-data-is-free-quantitative-usability-testing-if-you-use-it/</link>
	<description>Marketing Technology Musings and Tips by Jeff Larche</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digital Solid: Marketing Technology ROI &#187; Is it time to add this to your privacy policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsolid.com/2006/05/17/internal-search-data-is-free-quantitative-usability-testing-if-you-use-it/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Solid: Marketing Technology ROI &#187; Is it time to add this to your privacy policy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 04:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsolid.com/2006/05/17/internal-search-data-is-free-quantitative-usability-testing-if-you-use-it/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] The clause would have to do with use of internal search data. After all, I&#8217;ve written here about the utility of mining this type of search data. They are important markets to user behavior, and should be only ignored at your own risk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The clause would have to do with use of internal search data. After all, I&#8217;ve written here about the utility of mining this type of search data. They are important markets to user behavior, and should be only ignored at your own risk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
